Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Li Tu vs Andrew Harris Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tu vs Harris analysis and find out who is favored!
Li Tu vs Andrew Harris Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tu 1 - 0 Harris
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tu has won 52.15% of points on their second serve, while Harris has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tu, in recent form, has won 52.38% of their opponent's second serve points, while Harris has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.96% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tu has saved 66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Harris has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tu has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 40/ 32), with Harris winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 109/ 57), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 11/ 9). Harris has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 124/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Tu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.73% of matches (W/L 21/ 23), where as Harris has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tu winning 1 times and Harris being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tu winning 2 and Harris winning 0. The last match between Tu and Harris was at the M25 Bendigo, 06-03-2022, Final, Hard with Li Tu getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tu and Harris have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tu winning 0 times and Harris 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tu winning 0, and Harris 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tu has played against opponents with an average rank of 225.28 while Harris has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tu has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Harris has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tu has converted 37.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Harris has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
205
Rank
186
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
742
Rank
159
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
63% (162-97)
Career Total W/L
58% (154-110)
55% (16-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$139,510
Career Prize Money
$34,400
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Li Tu vs Andrew Harris For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Tu VS Harris
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Li Tu | Andrew Harris |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:6:0 | 1:6:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (27/41) | 72% (38/53) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 85% (23/27) | 55% (21/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (7/14) | 27% (4/15) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (28/53) | 27% (11/41) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Li Tu
Player
Andrew Harris
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Li Tu | Andrew Harris |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (16/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (35/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (330/301) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (14/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 125 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 43 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:59 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 240.14 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1221/1850) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (861/1221) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (328/629) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (67/179) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (739/1922) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 31% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 90% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (16/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 36% (5/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (17/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (17/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Li Tu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Li Tu
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Hamish Stewart
79%
(
61 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
9
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Li Tu
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Oliver Crawford
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Li Tu
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Philip Sekulic
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
104)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Li Tu
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
9
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Andrew Harris Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Andrew Harris
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Andrew Harris
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
13
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Harris
Player
Mikalai Haliak
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Andrew Harris
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve %
67%
(
10 of
15)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
8 of
11)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
21
Total Points Won
12
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrew Harris
Player
Robert Galloway
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Andrew Harris
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrew Harris
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
7
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(8) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Andrew Harris
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
5 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ken Cavrak
Player
Andrew Harris
60%
(
66 of
110)
1st Serve %
74%
(
88 of
119)
10
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
7
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
59 of
88)
36%
(
16 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
119)
117
Total Points Won
112
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tu Vs Harris Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Tu are available here and Harris photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
